Deceptive Patterns
‹ All reading

The Stakes of User Interface Design for Democracy

Author
Ellen P. Goodman
Date
7 Jul 2021
Publisher
Social Science Research Network
Focus
Law & Policy
Category
Academic Scholar

This paper proposes that platforms replace “decep­tive design” with empowering or “democratic design,” and surveys key examples, ranging from emissions labels on cars to health warnings on cigarette packs where regulations were guided by design principles.

Digital design choices such as color and font, the size and placement of action buttons, and the number of steps required to execute an action all shape the user experience (UX) and what information people absorb and release. Digital platforms and service providers shape the UX in ways that can be respectful of user autonomy and advance accurate, high-quality information, or in ways that subvert user choice and promote deception. Social media platforms have used “deceptive design” in many respects, making it easier to manipu­late users into taking actions, sacrificing data, and succumbing to beliefs they might not otherwise want to.